King Lear on Broadway

The Perks and Pitfalls of a Female King Lear

This article is over 5 years old and may contain outdated information

Recommended Videos

King Lear is the kind of show that just breathes toxic masculinity, to me. Focusing on a man who wants complete dedication from his daughters, what happens when the one daughter who tells him the reality of her affection is banished from his kingdom? He learns, through no one’s fault but his own, that asking for complete devotion from the women in his life (specifically his daughters) never bodes well for him.

So, what happens when you flip that and have an actress like Glenda Jackson bring Lear himself to life? To be quite honest, it makes the character’s actions even more despicable to me. Like most of Shakespeare’s work, King Lear is up for interpretation. Whether that means that we’re taking the women of his comedies and giving them agency or showing the destructive nature of Lady Macbeth without hiding her actions, we can take his work and do pretty much whatever we want with it.

Having women play both Lear and Gloucester? That proved to be an interesting choice, mainly because we are taught that these men are very deserved of what happens to them, and with the 21st-century feel of it, we don’t care that they suffered. Seeing two women take on the roles didn’t diminish that feeling.

Jackson brings Lear to life in the imposing way we’re used to, taking praise over the actuality of his daughters and their affections, but it isn’t just having Lear portrayed by a woman that makes this production so interesting; it’s also the staging. There’s a scene with Edmund and Goneril where the two have sex, Goneril then cleaning herself up and, essentially saying “something to remember me by,” she puts her hand down her pants and then places her hand on his lips.

To be quite honest, it was a moment that I never thought I’d see in a Shakespeare play, but here we are. It’s that kind of confidence and dedication that led each woman through the show, and while I believe that we, as the audience, focused too much on Lear and Gloucester being played by women, I think the show was successful in bringing King Lear to life. I had my problems with it, and I felt that it dragged on in bits (a problem I don’t think Shakespeare shows should have, since we can edit them accordingly), but overall, a must-see.

Plus, Pedro Pascal and Ruth Wilson just serve looks the entire show, so why not?

(image: Rachel Leishman)

Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!

—The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—


The Mary Sue is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Rachel Leishman
Rachel Leishman
Rachel Leishman (She/Her) is an Assistant Editor at the Mary Sue. She's been a writer professionally since 2016 but was always obsessed with movies and television and writing about them growing up. A lover of Spider-Man and Wanda Maximoff's biggest defender, she has interests in all things nerdy and a cat named Benjamin Wyatt the cat. If you want to talk classic rock music or all things Harrison Ford, she's your girl but her interests span far and wide. Yes, she knows she looks like Florence Pugh. She has multiple podcasts, normally has opinions on any bit of pop culture, and can tell you can actors entire filmography off the top of her head. Her current obsession is Glen Powell's dog, Brisket. Her work at the Mary Sue often includes Star Wars, Marvel, DC, movie reviews, and interviews.