Trump Is Now Angrily Tweeting at Clothing Retailers as His Conflicts of Interest Keep Getting Deeper and Darker

Donald Trump (and pretty much his whole family) has made it clear that he is both unwilling and unable to extricate himself from his financial conflicts of interest, and that when nearly half of American voters said they wanted “Trump the Businessman” to run the country, that’s now what we’ve gotten. (Meaning he makes a whole bunch of money while driving said business into the ground. It is, historically, the Trump way.)

But if you thought Trump’s bias couldn’t be in any more direct opposition with his role as President, it’s maybe time to stop assuming they’re a bottom to his depths of corruption. Because in response to the news that following a wide-reaching boycott, Nordstrom would be phasing out Ivanka Trump’s clothing line form their stores, here’s what Trump tweeted:

That statement was then retweeted by the official POTUS Twitter account, meaning, presumably, that this is the official position of the White House.

That means the official position of the White House is that “fairness” in business should be based on how good a daughter someone is, rather over what customers have said they want to buy. (The company is adamant that the removal of the line is due to poor performance, not due to their stance on either Trump personally.)

The official position is anti-Nordstrom.

The official position is that it’s acceptable for the President of the United States to comment on and criticize the inner workings of a clothing retailer.

Oh, and that it’s possibly acceptable for him to have done so IN THE MIDDLE OF A SECURITY BRIEFING.

In no way is it anything close to ethical for the President to attempt to use his power to bully companies into doing business with his family members. Sean Spicer defended Trump (obviously), saying in his press briefing Wednesday “I think this was less about his family business than an attack on his daughter.” That’s a ludicrous thing to say when when you’re talking about the President’s public statements, and holds absolutely no water at all when, again, those statements are retweeted from official political accounts. This is not about a father and daughter. It’s about a President trying to hold businesses hostage unless they do business with his family.

At the very least, it didn’t work.

(image via lev radin / Shutterstock)

Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!

—The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

Follow The Mary Sue on Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, Pinterest, & Google+.

Have a tip we should know? tips@themarysue.com

Author

Close

Vivian Kane

Vivian Kane (she/her) is the Senior News Editor at The Mary Sue, where she's been writing about politics and entertainment (and all the ways in which the two overlap) since the dark days of late 2016. Born in San Francisco and radicalized in Los Angeles, she now lives in Kansas City, Missouri, where she gets to put her MFA to use covering the local theatre scene. She is the co-owner of The Pitch, Kansas City’s alt news and culture magazine, alongside her husband, Brock Wilbur, with whom she also shares many cats.

twitter