Mad Max Comic Co-Creator Thinks We Need Captivity Spelled Out For Us… With Rape Scenes.
"Without it, the story could be viewed merely as a bunch of young spoilt girls..." - Mark Sexton
A few days ago, Mardoll alerted us via Twitter to a comics reader on Twitter posing this question to Mad Max: Fury Road comic co-creator, Mark Sexton:
@Mark_H_Sexton A few people are saying that you are exploiting rape in the first issue, what would you say to that?
— Z Film Reviews (@KameronJdevine) June 17, 2015
He’s not wrong. So, what did Sexton have to say to that? This:
@KameronJdevine Interesting. Could answer this any number of ways… — Mark Sexton (@Mark_H_Sexton) June 17, 2015
@KameronJdevine Best answer is that the use of institutionalised rape by Immortan Joe is not only central to the story –
— Mark Sexton (@Mark_H_Sexton) June 17, 2015
@KameronJdevine – but without it, the story could be viewed merely as a bunch of young spoilt girls whining about being kept in relative –
— Mark Sexton (@Mark_H_Sexton) June 17, 2015
@KameronJdevine – luxury by an older man who’s concerned with their safety. Not really much room for dramatic tension there..! — Mark Sexton (@Mark_H_Sexton) June 17, 2015
Um, you had me at “central to the story.” Had his reply just been that, I would’ve been like “You know what, I think that the fact that needing to see rapes happen all the time whenever they’re discussed in fiction is sensationalist and exploitative, but I get someone choosing to depict that.”
It would’ve been a different discussion.
But then he blathers on with this ridiculous idea that readers won’t understand what loss of freedom is, and I wonder if Sexton genuinely believes that. I wonder if he genuinely thinks people wouldn’t understand the concept of women wanting freedom from a pustule-ridden, old dictator who rapes them whenever they’re ovulating without seeing the rape happen. Because as is seemingly usually the case, both in fiction and IRL, a woman saying she’s suffering isn’t enough. It has to be seen to be believed.
Mardoll herself brought up this point on Twitter, relating it to Max:
I will never not be amazed by the idea that readers NEED rape scenes because otherwise forced captivity might seem awesome.
— Ana Mardoll (@AnaMardoll) June 23, 2015
I can only assume the comic which focuses on Max will have him raped multiple times, to clarify that being a blood bag is Not Fun.
— Ana Mardoll (@AnaMardoll) June 23, 2015
Some fans joined in on the sarcasm fun:
Can we really be sure Max wanted to escape? He only left because Nux took him for a ride. He probably liked it at the citadel. @PlasmaGrrl
— Ana Mardoll (@AnaMardoll) June 23, 2015
And Mardoll ended her commentary on the subject with:
I am, ofc, being sarcastic, but we are LITERALLY hearing that without rape, no one would sympathize with the wives wanting to leave!
— Ana Mardoll (@AnaMardoll) June 23, 2015
Being a “kept woman” is not freedom. Nothing that is free is “kept,” and a gilded cage is still a cage. And people understand that. We understood that in the Fury Road film! So the fact that Sexton says, without showing the rape, that readers might think the Wives are “spoilt girls whining about being kept…” disproves his own point about the need for the rape scene at all! Because without it, you still get a sense of women being “kept” somewhere. “Kept” is not freedom.
And so, it saddens me that the guy in charge of shepherding the Fury Road comic so fundamentally misunderstands his own source material.
—Please make note of The Mary Sue’s general comment policy.—
Do you follow The Mary Sue on Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, Pinterest, & Google +?
Have a tip we should know? tips@themarysue.com