Skip to main content

Nancy Pelosi Really & Truly Thought It Was Acceptable to Thank George Floyd for “Sacrificing Your Life”

Peak "well-meaning white woman" stuff.

U.S. Speaker of the House Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) speaks while wearing a mask

Recommended Videos

Following the conviction of Derek Chauvin for murdering George Floyd, a lot of politicians, public figures, and brands issued statements in response. Some of them shouldn’t have.

“Thank you, George Floyd, for sacrificing your life for justice,” Nancy Pelosi said during a news conference Tuesday. “For being there to call out to your mom, how heartbreaking was that—to call out for your mom, ‘I can’t breathe.'”

“And because of you,” she continued, “your name will always be synonymous with justice.”

George Floyd did not “sacrifice” himself and he’s not a symbol. He is a man who was murdered by a police officer who was acting within the purposefully racist system of American law enforcement. Thanking Floyd is incredibly insulting and a major oversimplification of what this actually means in terms of “justice”—which is very little.

Derek Chauvin is one man being held accountable for his crimes in a way that few police officers are—practically none. Real justice would include, among other things, a complete overhaul of the policing system, including defunding that system and reallocating money to services that actually help people, especially Black and brown people. Justice would mean abolishing qualified immunity so that more than just this one police officer could be held accountable. Justice would mean living in a country where a Black teenage girl isn’t killed by the police the same day Chauvin is convicted.

Nancy Pelosi has supported the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, but she also supported including police unions in discussions of police reform (an absolutely terrible idea) and she does not support defunding police systems. Also, over the course of her decades in Congress, she has also supported some truly damaging “tough on crime” bills, like the 1994 Crime Law that led to a surge in mass incarceration.

Basically, her allyship is not a given; she has to work to prove that through her actions. And while I’m sure she thought she was saying something nice yesterday, as one of the most powerful people in the entire country, this kind of reductive platitude is unacceptable.

(image: Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!

The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

Have a tip we should know? tips@themarysue.com

Author
Vivian Kane
Vivian Kane (she/her) is the Senior News Editor at The Mary Sue, where she's been writing about politics and entertainment (and all the ways in which the two overlap) since the dark days of late 2016. Born in San Francisco and radicalized in Los Angeles, she now lives in Kansas City, Missouri, where she gets to put her MFA to use covering the local theatre scene. She is the co-owner of The Pitch, Kansas City’s alt news and culture magazine, alongside her husband, Brock Wilbur, with whom she also shares many cats.

Filed Under:

Follow The Mary Sue:

Exit mobile version