Falcon 9 rocket

SpaceX’s Falcon 9 Did Land, but It May Be Too Damaged to Fly Again

"This is the part where we blow up!" "Not today!"
This article is over 8 years old and may contain outdated information

Recommended Videos

SpaceX’s second, most recent rocket landing was an impressive feat that even founder and CEO Elon Musk wasn’t expecting, after the rocket propelled a communications satellite into geostationary orbit about 22,000 miles above the Earth. However, increased landing difficulty isn’t the only problem with reaching the necessary speeds for that mission—damage to the rocket may prevent even a successful landing from being worth it.

Of course, the point of landing a rocket isn’t just so we can pat ourselves on the back about how far humanity’s space technology has come. We want to be able to reuse rockets to lower the cost of space travel, increasing its practicality so that we can become a more regularly space-faring civilization. It’s tough enough to launch a rocket that’s been freshly built without things ending in an explosion (which SpaceX has some regrettable experience with), so it’s critical that rockets we want to reuse are in good enough working condition to fly again.

The Falcon 9 that landed on May 6 likely won’t be able to do that, as Musk commented on Twitter that it took “max damage.” After separating from the satellite and the second stage rocket that would propel the equipment to its final destination, the first stage of the Falcon 9 plunged back into Earth’s atmosphere at 4,373 miles per hour (5.7 times the speed of sound), or more than a mile per second. Not only is that quite an impact to survive, but a lot of stress is involved as the rocket needs to fire its engines to slow down, in this case going from 441MPH to 134MPH in just three seconds as it prepare for its final descent.

It’s not all over for the Falcon 9, though, as the high level of damage still makes it a valuable benchmark for ground tests, even if it won’t fly again. Musk wrote, “Most recent rocket took max damage, due to v high entry velocity. Will be our life leader for ground tests to confirm others are good.” As always, that’s the great thing about science: “Failures” are just as useful—if not more—than success.

(via Discovery News, image via SpaceX)

—The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—

Follow The Mary Sue on Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, Pinterest, & Google+.


The Mary Sue is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Dan Van Winkle
Dan Van Winkle
Dan Van Winkle (he) is an editor and manager who has been working in digital media since 2013, first at now-defunct Geekosystem (RIP), and then at The Mary Sue starting in 2014, specializing in gaming, science, and technology. Outside of his professional experience, he has been active in video game modding and development as a hobby for many years. He lives in North Carolina with Lisa Brown (his wife) and Liz Lemon (their dog), both of whom are the best, and you will regret challenging him at Smash Bros.