science woman novartis vaccines research lab

Things We Saw Today: Gender Stereotypes Are Screwing Up Medical Research to No One’s Surprise

Plus Captain Marvel, Disney princesses and more!
This article is over 5 years old and may contain outdated information

Recommended Videos

Women: we’re 51% of the population, yet we continue to be treated like outliers and anomalies. Dr. Rebecca Shanksy, a neuroscientist at Northeastern University, delves into the effect that gender stereotypes have on biomedical research in a new article in Science. Namely, studies that use a majority of male test subjects as the default in data collection, discounting the results yielded by female test subjects.

While the National Institutes of Health require the inclusion of female subjects in research, they are frequently outnumbered by male subjects and differences in sex are not given the same weight. Shanksy says, “It seems like such an obvious thing to a normal person. But when you come up in the academic and science world, it’s like, ‘Oh no, females are so complicated, so we just don’t study them.'”

In her article, she explains “The notion that a woman’s disposition is a direct product of the activity in her ovaries persists today. Women, but not men, are still pejoratively described as hormonal or emotional, which curiously neglects the well-documented fact that men also possess both hormones and emotions. On a societal and cultural level, this stereotype feeds implicit (and explicit) biases in policy-making, hiring practices, and education, doing a disservice to people of all genders.”

This has major ramifications when it comes to healthcare, medical research, and the development of prescription drugs. Neurobiologist Daniela Pollak touched on the same issues of sex and gender bias saying, “We live in a world where the assumption is that males are the standard, the reference population, and females are the ones that are odd.”

Sadly, this bias exists in all facets of data collection, as seen in the excellent book Invisible Women by Caroline Criado Perez. Criado Perez studies several examples of the gender data gap, ranging from medical to car safety to tech advancements to paint a picture of a world that is designed for and by men.

Ultimately, it comes down to good, thorough science that doesn’t treat sex like a variable, but as an independent control. Shanksy sums it up perfectly by saying, “All of this is about embracing the diversity of the brain and variable data should not be ignored or seen as a negative thing.”

(via New York Times, image: Flickr)

How are spending your Sunday, Sue Believers?

Want more stories like this? Become a subscriber and support the site!

The Mary Sue has a strict comment policy that forbids, but is not limited to, personal insults toward anyone, hate speech, and trolling.—


The Mary Sue is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Chelsea Steiner
Chelsea Steiner
Chelsea was born and raised in New Orleans, which explains her affinity for cheesy grits and Britney Spears. An pop culture journalist since 2012, her work has appeared on Autostraddle, AfterEllen, and more. Her beats include queer popular culture, film, television, republican clownery, and the unwavering belief that 'The Long Kiss Goodnight' is the greatest movie ever made. She currently resides in sunny Los Angeles, with her husband, 2 sons, and one poorly behaved rescue dog. She is a former roller derby girl and a black belt in Judo, so she is not to be trifled with. She loves the word “Jewess” and wishes more people used it to describe her.